Observing atmospheric methane - 12 years of analysis

An international consortium of multi-disciplinary scientists has compiled a synthesis of the global methane budget, documenting and analyzing its enigmatic changes since the year 2000. Unlike carbon dioxide, in the late 1990s the growth rate of methane slowed to zero, and scientists struggled to explain this unexpected change. After a period of stability until around 2006, the amount of methane in the atmosphere began to rise again. Since 2014 atmospheric methane concentrations are rising at a faster rate than at any time in the previous two decades, approaching the most greenhouse-gas-intensive scenarios proposed. The reasons for this increase are hotly debated.

Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, 28 times more powerful - per kg - than carbon dioxide on a 100-year time horizon, and its concentration in the atmosphere has increased by 150% since 1750, largely due to human activity. Particularly with regard to the mitigation of climate change, the knowledge of methane sources, concentrations and removal processes from the atmosphere is becoming increasingly important. The overlapping geographical distribution of different methane sources and uncertainties in the loss rate of methane in the atmosphere by short-lived radicals make the problem difficult.

Only by combining top-down (atmospheric observations and inverse modeling using transport models) and bottom-up (land surface process models, inventories for anthropogenic emissions) approaches were researchers able to succeed in analyzing and synthesizing current knowledge about the global and regional methane budgets. The new comprehensive study was published online in the journal Earth System Science Data on December 12, 2016.

“One of the most difficult aspects of determining methane fluxes through atmospheric inversion is the fact that all the source categories and even the sinks are rather uncertain”, explains Julia Marshall of the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena, Germany, who contributed model simulations to the study. “This has led to a variety of contradictory theories being put forward in the literature to explain both the flattening of the growth rate as well as the subsequent increase. Based upon the available measurements of atmospheric methane alone, it is difficult to convincingly prove a given theory. This is where the combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches, organized within the Global Carbon Project, can help constrain the problem.”

The study estimated the global methane emissions to be approximately 559 [540-570] TgCH4/yr over the period 2003-2012 through an ensemble of “top-down” approaches. The global methane sources are distributed across a range of categories, with approximately 60% considered to be anthropogenic, or directly attributable to human activity. Natural methane sources include wetlands and geologic seeps. Of the anthropogenic emissions, approximately 60% are due to agricultural activities and waste management, while approximately one third is linked to fossil fuel production and use.

In the near future operational networks like the European ICOS infrastructure will allow continuous, high quality, and standardized data on atmospheric trace gases as well as shorter analysis times. The Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry is contributing to this network with its flask and calibration laboratory ICOS-FCL.

Publication:
Global Methane budget 2000-2012
Marielle Saunois, Philippe Bousquet, Ben Poulter, Anna Peregon, Philippe Ciais, Josep G. Canadell, Edward J. Dlugokencky, Giuseppe Etiope, David Bastviken, Sander Houweling, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Francesco N. Tubiello, Simona Castaldi, Robert B. Jackson, Mihai Alexe, Vivek K. Arora, David J. Beerling, Peter Bergamaschi, Donald R. Blake, Gordon Brailsford, Victor Brovkin, Lori Bruhwiler, Cyril Crevoisier, Patrick Crill, Kristofer Covey, Charles Curry, Christian Frankenberg, Nicola Gedney, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Misa Ishizawa, Akihiko Ito, Fortunat Joos, Heon-Sook Kim, Thomas Kleinen, Paul Krummel, Jean-François Lamarque, Ray Langenfelds, Robin Locatelli, Toshinobu Machida, Shamil Maksyutov, Kyle C. McDonald, Julia Marshall, Joe R. Melton, Isamu Morino, Vaishali Naik, Simon O’Doherty, Frans-Jan W. Parmentier, Prabir K. Patra, Changhui Peng, Shushi Peng, Glen P. Peters, Isabelle Pison, Catherine Prigent, Ronald Prinn, Michel Ramonet, William J. Riley, Makoto Saito, Monia Santini, Ronny Schroeder, Isobel J. Simpson, Renato Spahni, Paul Steele, Atsushi Takizawa, Brett F. Thornton, Hanqin Tian, Yasunori Tohjima, Nicolas Viovy, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Michiel van Weele, Guido R. van der Werf, RayWeiss, Christine Wiedinmyer, David J. Wilton, Andy Wiltshire, Doug Worthy, Debra Wunch, Xiyan Xu, Yukio Yoshida, Bowen Zhang, Zhen Zhang, Qiuan Zhu
Earth System Science Data(2016)
DOI:10.5194/essd-8-697-2016

Editorial:
Saunois M, RB Jackson, P Bousquet, B Poulter, JG Canadell 2016 The growing role of methane in anthropogenic climate change. Environmental Research Letters 11, 120207, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/120207. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/120207

Access:
Data and figures
Data at CDIAC
Social media:
Facebook
Twitter: @gcarbonproject
Infographics
Funding disclosure:
Contributors to the Global Carbon Budget 2016 are funded by research organisations and government departments in multiple countries and supported by their organisations.
The Global Carbon Atlas is funded by the BNP Paribas Foundation


Contact:
Julia Marshall
MPI for Biogeochemistry
07745 Jena, Germany
Phone: +49 (0)3641-57 6383
Email: marshall@bgc-jena.mpg.de